Cargo vessel at sea

The Maersk Saltoro Incident: What Cargo Owners Should Do Next

A practical guide to recovery when vessel disruptions destroy cargo value

Back to Blog
Case Studies•9 min read•April 17, 2025

By StilFresh Team

When a vessel carrying perishable cargo breaks down mid-voyage, the commercial damage often begins long before the cargo reaches port.

The recent Maersk Saltoro incident is a textbook example of how operational disruptions can quickly turn into a large cargo claims crisis.

The case involved a vessel carrying around 1,318 containers of Chilean cherries, representing nearly five million boxes valued between $60 million and $130 million.

What Happened to the Maersk Saltoro

The vessel departed Chile on 27 December 2024, carrying a large volume of cherries destined for the Chinese market. The cargo was expected to arrive 20 January 2025, in time for the critical Chinese New Year sales period.

However, on 13 January 2025, the vessel suffered a technical failure near Micronesia, leaving it adrift in the Pacific Ocean. The result was a delay of almost a month.

The vessel eventually arrived at Nansha Port in China on 17 February, roughly 28 days later than scheduled. By that time the commercial window for the cherries had already closed.

The Immediate Consequences

The delay had several cascading effects:

Missed Market Window

The Chinese New Year period represents the peak demand for Chilean cherries. Missing this sales window dramatically reduces market value.

Cargo Condition Deterioration

Initial inspections reported thawing and mold in several containers, leading to cargo rejection and destruction by Chinese authorities.

Industry Impact

The incident occurred during a season when Chilean cherry exports to China had already increased by over 50 percent, amplifying the economic impact across the industry.

Step 1: Place the Carrier on Formal Notice

The first action cargo owners must take is placing the carrier on formal notice of claim. Under many maritime conventions such as the Hague-Visby Rules, notice of visible damage must typically be issued within three days of delivery.

The notice should clearly state:

  • The cargo suffered damage due to delay
  • The carrier may be liable under the contract of carriage
  • The cargo owner reserves the right to recover damages

In many jurisdictions, a formal notice by email is sufficient.

Step 2: Assemble the Evidence

Strong cargo claims are built on documentation. The recovery guide highlights several critical documents that cargo owners should gather immediately:

Core Shipment Records

  • Bill of Lading
  • Commercial invoices
  • Packing lists
  • Sales contracts

Operational Evidence

  • Voyage tracking data
  • Correspondence with the carrier
  • Customs rejection notices

Cold Chain Evidence

  • Temperature logs
  • Pre-shipment inspection reports
  • Surveyor reports confirming cargo condition

Without these documents, both insurance claims and recovery actions become significantly more difficult.

Step 3: Decide How to Pursue the Claim

Cargo owners generally have two recovery paths.

1. Claim Through Cargo Insurance

If the shipment was insured, the cargo owner submits the claim to their insurer. Once the insurer compensates the loss, the insurer gains the legal right to pursue recovery against the carrier through subrogation. This process may take months or years, but the cargo owner receives compensation sooner.

2. Claim Directly Against the Carrier

If the cargo is uninsured, the cargo owner must pursue the carrier directly. This typically involves alleging breach of the carrier's duty to transport the cargo safely and within a reasonable time under the Bill of Lading contract.

The Defenses the Carrier Is Likely to Raise

Shipping lines rarely accept liability immediately. The Maersk Saltoro recovery guide identifies several defenses carriers may rely on:

  • Perils of the sea: The carrier may argue the delay was caused by unforeseen circumstances.
  • Errors in navigation or management: Crew actions may be cited to avoid liability.
  • Inherent vice: The carrier may argue that the cherries naturally deteriorate due to limited shelf life.
  • Acts of public authorities: Customs rejection may be presented as an external factor.
  • Limitation of liability: Carriers may attempt to cap damages under the Hague-Visby Rules.

Each of these defenses requires technical and legal counter-arguments supported by evidence.

The Larger Lesson for Perishable Cargo

The Maersk Saltoro case highlights a broader reality in global perishables trade. Perishable cargo does not simply depend on refrigeration. It depends on timing.

A shipment may arrive cold, but if it arrives too late for the market, the commercial loss can still be catastrophic.

For exporters and insurers, this means that risk management must consider:

  • Vessel reliability
  • Voyage routing
  • Market timing exposure
  • Contractual protections

Final Takeaways for Cargo Owners

The recovery guide summarises several key lessons:

  • Act quickly to protect legal deadlines
  • Gather documentation immediately
  • Challenge carrier defenses carefully
  • Persist with recovery efforts
  • Improve future contractual protections

Download the Maersk Saltoro – What Next? Guide

Get the complete recovery guide with step-by-step instructions, carrier defense strategies, and practical lessons for protecting perishable cargo.